John Giduck’s mouthpiece site posted a copy of his lawsuit on their SOCNET Lies website and made these comments:

Dr John Giduck has maintained from the beginning that he has nothing to hide and that the misinformation, lies and attacks were being perpetrated with deliberate malice and reckless indifference. His filing of this suit and the accompanying scrutiny that a trial by jury will bring is testament to this

It makes disturbing reading and shows the lengths the perpetrators have gone to in their vendetta against Dr John Giduck his family, friends and associates.

Let’s see what the judge had to say about Mr. Giduck’s claims…


Clearly, we have maintained that John Giduck is a liar and he proved that he is still a liar after all. The judge clearly sided with the defendants in his ruling to dismiss.  The opinion reads in part as follows:

There is absolutely no allegation in any of these nine claims for relief that these Defendants did anything wrong, did anything injurious to Plaintiffs, or, for that matter, that these particular Defendants did anything at all.

The first amendment clearly stills holds weight in the US…even if things aren’t done this way in places like Russia…

Applying the settled law set forth above to the facts alleged in the Amended Complaint the Court finds and concludes that the statements attributed to these Defendants are constitutionally privileged statements of opinion protected by the First Amendment.

As noted above, the judgement goes on to read…

Per C.R.S. 1317201, Defendants are awarded their reasonable attorney fees.

This might end up an expensive proposition for John Giduck given the number of defendants that John Giduck named.  I’ll have more comment later…


A Review of John Giduck’s False Special Forces Legend

John Giduck: The Only Russian Special Forces Consultant That Couldn’t Complete Basic Training

Why Did John Giduck Flee to West Virginia In 1993?

John Giduck & Joe Bail: Timeline Supports $20k+ Honorarium For Consulting Services